Fact: Respect must be EARNED--not taught. Victims
of hazing rarely report having respect for those who have hazed them. Just like
other forms of victimization, hazing breeds mistrust, apathy and
alienation.
Intake is the law of the land. M.I.P.(Membership
Intake Process). 'Skating' is a term of the past. Pledging, hazing and the like
are all illegal. Each hazing incident places organizations in jeopardy as each
incident is a potential criminal & civil law suit under tort law. F.S.11006.63 (3rd degree Felony) In fact, states
such as Florida, that have laws against hazing, consent of the victim can not be
used as a defense in a civil suit. This is because even if someone agrees to
participate in a potentially hazardous action it may not be true consent when
considering the peer pressure and desire to belong to the group.
“Hazing” refers to any activity expected of
someone joining a group (or to maintain full status in a group) that humiliates,
degrades or risks emotional and/or physical harm, regardless of the person's
willingness to participate. In years past, hazing practices were typically
considered harmless pranks or comical antics associated with young men in
college fraternities.
Today we know that hazing extends far beyond
college fraternities and is experienced by boys/men and girls/women in school
groups, university organizations, athletic teams, the military, and other social
and professional organizations. Hazing is a complex social problem that is
shaped by power dynamics operating in a group and/or organization and within a
particular cultural context.
Hazing activities are generally considered to
be: physically abusive, hazardous, and/or sexually violating. The specific
behaviors or activities within these categories vary widely among participants,
groups and settings. While alcohol use is common in many types of hazing, other
examples of typical hazing practices include: personal servitude; sleep
deprivation and restrictions on personal hygiene; yelling, swearing and
insulting new members/rookies; being forced to wear embarrassing or humiliating
attire in public; consumption of vile substances or smearing of such on one's
skin; brandings; physical beatings; binge drinking and drinking games; sexual
simulation and sexual assault.
In the Alfred/NCAA survey of college athletes,
hazing was defined as: "any
activity expected of someone joining a group that humiliates, degrades, abuses
or endangers, regardless of the person's willingness to participate. This does
not include activities such as rookies carrying the balls, team parties with
community games, or going out with your teammates, unless an atmosphere of
humiliation, degradation, abuse or danger arises."
“Hazing is an activity that a high-status member
orders other members to engage in or suggests that they engage in that in some
way humbles a newcomer who lacks the power to resist, because he or she want to
gain admission to a group. Hazing can be noncriminal, but it is nearly always
against the rules of an institution, team, or Greek group. It can be criminal,
which means that a state statute has been violated. This usually occurs when a
pledging-related activity results in gross physical injury or death” (from Hank
Nuwer's book Wrongs of Passage
, 1999, p. xxv).
Hazing is defined by the FIPG (Fraternal
Information Programming Group) as: "Any action taken or situation created,
intentionally, whether on or off fraternity premises, to produce mental or
physical discomfort, embarrassment, harassment, or ridicule. Such activities may
include but are not limited to the following: use of alcohol; paddling in any
form; creation of excessive fatigue; physical and psychological shocks; quests,
treasure hunts, scavenger hunts, road trips or any other such activities carried
on outside or inside of the confines of the chapter house; wearing of public
apparel which is conspicuous and not normally in good taste; engaging in public
stunts and buffoonery; morally degrading or humiliating games and activities;
and any other activities which are not consistent with fraternal law, ritual or
policy or the regulations and policies of the educational
institution."
The following are some
examples of hazing divided into three categories: subtle, harassment, and
violent. It is impossible to list all possible hazing behaviors because many are
context-specific. While this is not an all-inclusive list, it provides some
common examples of hazing traditions.
|
A. SUBTLE HAZING: Behaviors that emphasize a power imbalance between new members/rookies and other members of the group or team. Termed “subtle hazing” because these types of hazing are often taken-for-granted or accepted as “harmless” or meaningless. Subtle hazing typically involves activities or attitudes that breach reasonable standards of mutual respect and place new members/rookies on the receiving end of ridicule, embarrassment, and/or humiliation tactics. New members/rookies often feel the need to endure subtle hazing to feel like part of the group or team. (Some types of subtle hazing may also be considered harassment hazing). |
|
B. HARASSMENT HAZING: Behaviors that cause emotional anguish or physical discomfort in order to feel like part of the group. Harassment hazing confuses, frustrates, and causes undue stress for new members/rookies. (Some types of harassment hazing can also be considered violent hazing). |
|
C. VIOLENT HAZING : Behaviors that have the potential to cause physical and/or emotional, or psychological harm. |
|
Hazing at any age can be exceedingly harmful.
Hazing at the high school level is particularly troubling because the
developmental stages of adolescence create a situation in which many students
are more vulnerable to peer pressure due to the tremendous need for belonging,
making friends and finding approval in one’s peer group.